SPECULATOR: Recency bias rebounds, 2020 hitters

We focus on last year wayyy too much.

Sure, it's important to look at 2019 when evaluating 2020 outlooks—it's the most recent data point we have—but doing so in a vacuum can lead to a ton of blind spots. In times like these, we can't repeat these BaseballHQ axioms enough (though we try):

Regression is our game's most powerful force.

Once you display a skill, you own it.

Putting stock in a player's most recent performance to guide your decisions—often referred to as recency bias—is a natural tendency. Resist the urge. Our marketplace tends to be littered with recency bias, as last year's breakouts are often fully priced, last year's duds are often discounted, and previous track records are often forgotten.

So this week, we're striking...

Almost!

You’re just a few clicks away from accessing this feature and hundreds more throughout the year that have a singular goal in mind: Winning your league. Subscribe to BaseballHQ.com here!

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

More From Speculator

We follow up on some early (and mid) season speculations to find out what went right, what went wrong, and what actually happened.
Sep 10 2024 3:03am
Our annual exercise of giving out second chances to those who, frankly, stunk up the joint in 2024.
Sep 4 2024 3:04am
Things get weird in September. We look through some fantasy-relevant playing time experiments, with tidbits from the remaining schedule.
Aug 28 2024 3:07am
We play a game of before and after, looking at key skills rising and falling since June.
Aug 21 2024 3:10am
We continue last week's exercise looking at this year's rookie returns, and speculating on revised outlooks.
Aug 14 2024 3:04am

Tools